« January 2009 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
2nd amendment rights
4-H and Agenda 21
Agenda 21
Alaska Represenatives
Animal Disease Testing
COOL
Dog Laws
Equine Working Group
FDA
Food
GIS
Govenor Palin
HSUS & PETA
I'm Tired
ICAR
NAIS
Real ID
Trade
UNESCO
USDA
World Trade Agreements
Rants on This and That
Monday, 12 January 2009
OIE Terrestrial and Dogs
Topic: Dog Laws
http://www.oie.int/eng/bien_etre/Presentation_73SG.pdf
Please note page one Companion animal welfare-urban animal control
General Definitions from the OIE Terrestrial Code   See Animal welfare
http://www.oie.int/downld/SC/2008/A_TAHSCMARCH2008_PART%20I_XXX.pdf

Future developments http://www.oie.int/eng/bien_etre/en_introduction.htm

Notwithstanding the progress made to date, there are still many challenges and the OIE continues to develop its standard setting work into new areas of importance to animal welfare.

In 2007, the OIE is in the process of finalising Guidelines for the Control of Stray Dog Populations. This work falls within the OIE mandates for animal health, public health and animal welfare, as it addresses humane methods for the control of dog populations and the prevention of important zoonotic diseases, such as rabies and hydatidosis, in communities.

 

See attached Document   This document is from the USDA from the OIE it appears the dog laws are generating from the OIE via the ngo's which are the likes of Peta, Human Society of America etc. Your animal activists.

 Www.Aphis.USDA.gov/import_export/animals/oie/downloads/tahc-guide-dog-pop-cont-76-mar07.RTF -

Legislation

Legislation that would help authories to establishing successful dog control programmes should include the following key elements:

Registration and identification of dogs and licensing of owners

Rabies Vaccination

Veterinary procedure (e.g. Surgical procedures)

Control of dog movement (restrictions with the country)

Control of dog movement ( international movement)

Control of dangerous dogs

Commercial dog production

Environmental controls (e.g. Abattoirs, rubbish,dumps,dead stock facilites)

 Dog shelters

Animal welfare, including human capture and killing methods

Resources available to authorities

Human resources

Financial resources

Please note this language, its this same that is being used with the NAIS. Include appropriate veterinarians, experts and stakeholders. More terminology used REHOMING FEES. The main purpose of this advisory group would be to analyze the problem, identify the causes and propose the most effective approaches to use in the short and long term.  

 

DOGS are now being controlled by the OIE, by an organization under the United Nations. 

www.naisinfocentral.net


Posted by xstatic99645 at 12:26 PM YST
Updated: Friday, 20 March 2009 9:01 AM YDT
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
Certification of Origin
Topic: COOL
The new international rules on certification of origin and health of live animals or food of animal origin traded either locally or internationally have created an opportune moment for the development of standardized animal identification and registration (I&R) systems.
This goal is now becoming realistic driven by world trade requirements and could eventually benefit livestock developments many ways.

Posted by xstatic99645 at 12:22 PM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
The USDA needs to get out of the Food business before they kill the food supply
Topic: Food

Quote from Article "We need to look long-term, because we've got a long-term problem," U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer said at a recent press briefing on food and fuel.

"If you look at how to deal with this, we need to convince other nations in this world to increase yields. And that means the use of biotechnology products. It means better water management, better fertilizer management, and precision farming methods," he said.

"If other countries do not increase yields comparable to those that we see here in the United States, people are going to go hungry. It's that simple."

1: He is saying we must promote Monsanto
2: He is saying to promote Factory Farming
3: How can some poor countries have better water management when there is NO water..
4: How can some poor countries afford fertilizer?
5: And these poor countries will be forced in Animal ID as Animal ID is a world wide mandate if you want to TRADE.
6: How will these poor farmers afford to comply with animal ID when they have NO electrictricy, when they have no computers, when they have no phones etc.
This is the driving force behind ALL animal id world wide. That is the POWER behind the NAIS. That is why our representatives will not say an outright NO. Trade is worth more then the financial burdens we will accrue, Trade is worth more then the time consuming reporting that we will have to comply with, Trade is worth more then the RFID that can be hacked. Trade is worth more then that one horse should it develop a issue with injectable RFID.
The United States of America has sold all of us out to Foreign Agreements that "We the People" did not vote for all for "TRADE". http://www.oie.int/eng/Edito/en_lastedito.htm  They are abiding by organizations such as the OIE, FAO, WHO, Codex Alimentarius Commission.  Quote "The aims of the conference will be to emphasise the importance and benefits of identification and traceability, to raise awareness of existing OIE and Codex standards, to determine future requirements for standards, and to provide advice and assistance on implementing standards, especially on behalf of developing countries."
Quote "New technologies in animal production, such as animal cloning and transgenic animals, will create a need for additional arrangements to trace animals. Under certain circumstances authorities would have to trace every individual animal and animal product derived from these novel production methods. New technologies may also offer solutions. For example, DNA identification makes it possible to identify and monitor animals and animal products through to the retail level. Nonetheless, whether using high-tech or simple paper-based filing systems, the principles of traceability as defined in the Terrestrial Animal Health Code are universal, and apply equally in all situations."
Look up Transgentic animals!

Posted by xstatic99645 at 12:20 PM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
USDA Harmonizes cattle trade with Canada in line with International Animal Health Statandards
Topic: World Trade Agreements
http://www.oie.int/eng/publicat/en_code.htm
The value of the Terrestrial Code is twofold: that the measures published in it are the result of consensus among the veterinary authorities of OIE Member Countries, and that it constitutes a reference within the World Trade Organization Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures as an international standard for animal health and zoonoses.
 December 15, 2003    Http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/dec03/031215i.asp

Guidelines offer up-to-date information, flexibility
Because the OIE standards on BSE are guidelines, and not laws, countries have some flexibility in how they use them, Dr. Fernandez said. This has led to some disparities in how countries interpret the guidelines and whether they use them at all.

Terrestrial Animal Health Code 2007 - OIE
http://www.oie.int/Eng/normes/mcode/en_chapitre_3.5.1.htm
Read this very closely,
Animal identification and animal traceability are tools for addressing animal health (including zoonoses) and food safety issues. These tools may significantly improve the effectiveness of activities such as: the management of disease outbreaks and food safety incidents, vaccination programmes, herd/flock husbandry, zoning/compartmentalisation, surveillance, early response and notification systems, animal movement controls, inspection, certification, fair practices in trade and the utilisation of veterinary drugs, feed and pesticides at farm level.
  1. There is a strong relationship between animal identification and the traceability of animals and products of animal origin.   (MY notes COOL equals Animal Origin)

  2. Animal traceability and traceability of products of animal origin should have the capability to be linked to achieve traceability throughout the animal production and food chain taking into account relevant OIE and Codex Alimentarius standards.

  3. The objective(s) of animal identification and animal traceability for a particular country, zone or compartment and the approach used should be clearly defined following an assessment of the risks to be addressed and a consideration of the factors listed below. They should be defined through consultation between the Veterinary Authority and relevant sectors/stakeholders prior to implementation, and periodically reviewed.

  4. There are various factors which may determine the system chosen for animal identification and animal traceability. Factors such as the outcomes of the risk assessment, the animal and public health situation (including zoonoses) and related programmes, animal population parameters (such as species and breeds, numbers and distribution), types of production, animal movement patterns, available technologies, trade in animals and animal products, cost/benefit analysis and other economic, geographical and environmental considerations, and cultural aspects, should be taken into account when designing the system.

  5. Animal identification and animal traceability should be under the responsibility of the Veterinary Authority. It is recognised that other Authorities may have jurisdiction over other aspects of the food chain, including the traceability of food.

  6. The Veterinary Authority, with relevant governmental agencies and in consultation with the private sector, should establish a legal framework for the implementation and enforcement of animal identification and animal traceability in the country. In order to facilitate compatibility and consistency, relevant international standards and obligations should be taken into account. This legal framework should include elements such as the objectives, scope, organisational arrangements including the choice of technologies used for identification and registration, obligations of all the parties involved including third parties implementing traceability systems, confidentiality, accessibility issues and the efficient exchange of information.

  7. Whatever the specific objectives of the chosen animal identification system and animal traceability, there is a series of common basic factors, and these must be considered before implementation, such as the legal framework, procedures, the Competent Authority, identification of establishments/owners, animal identification and animal movements.

  8. The equivalent outcomes based on performance criteria rather than identical systems based on design criteria should be the basis for comparison of animal identification systems and animal traceability

 

Bruce Knight:

If you're producing for the global market you must have a high quality beef product to sell. But to gain access to the market, you must be able to demonstrate traceability along with a concern for animal welfare.  (My Note: Animal welfare is in the OIE recommendations)

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/newsroom/speeches/content/2008/03/Houston_Livestock_Show_final_3-4-08.pdf

Other countries, which don't yet have their own traceability systems fully in place and therefore can't, under WTO rules require it of other countries, will still prefer to purchase from sources that can demonstrate traceability. Dr.Smith cited Canada, Taiwan, some South American countries and most Arabian Gulf nations as examples of countries that are interested in traceability. He pointed out that not every single U.S. Producer will have to demonstrate traceability-only those in supply-chains that want to sell abroad.

But the sooner producers in the U.S. And around the world get on board with animal ID, the more options they will have to market their livestock. In other words, traceability is the key to international sales and market expansion. Animal ID will open doors for producers everywhere.

 

In order to walk the talk with the USDA here is the General Definitions used . There are more here http://www.oie.int/Eng/normes/mcode/en_chapitre_1.1.1.htm#terme_identification_des_animaux
Animal identification
Means the combination of the identification and registration of an animal individually, with a unique identifier, or collectively by its epidemiological unit or group, with a unique group identifier.
Animal traceability
Means the ability to follow an animal or group of animals during all stages of its life.
Risk assessment
Means the evaluation of the likelihood and the biological and economic consequences of entry, establishment, or spread of a pathogenic agent within the territory of an importing country.
Veterinary Authority
Means the Governmental Authority of a Member Country, comprising veterinarians, other professionals and para-professionals, having the responsibility and competence for ensuring or supervising the implementation of animal health and welfare measures, international veterinary certification and other standards and guidelines in the Terrestrial Code in the whole country.
Competent Authority
Means the Veterinary Authority or other Governmental Authority of a Member Country having the responsibility and competence for ensuring or supervising the implementation of animal health and welfare measures, international veterinary certification and other standards and guidelines in the Terrestrial Code in the whole country.
Establishment
Means the premises in which animals are kept.

Posted by xstatic99645 at 10:33 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | View Comments (4) | Permalink
The real purpose of Real ID
Topic: Real ID
The REAL Purpose of the REAL ID
Under the section headed 'Securing North America from External Threats' is the following statement. "We will develop standards for lower-cost secure proof of status and nationality documents to facilitate cross-border travel and work to achieve optimal production before January 1, 2008."

Sounds Like NAIS doesn't it?  in order to trade you will need a premises id to Facilitate  Trade

Posted by xstatic99645 at 10:23 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
The Areement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)
Topic: World Trade Agreements
 
 http://www.standardsinfo.net/info/livelink/fetch/2000/148478/6301438/inttrade.html
 
THE AGREEMENT ON TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE (TBT)

The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) - sometimes referred to as the Standards Code - is one of the legal texts of the WTO Agreement which obliges WTO Members to ensure that technical regulations, voluntary standards and conformity assessment procedures do not create unnecessary obstacles to trade. Annex 3 (PDF file, 26 KB) of the TBT Agreement is the Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards which is known as the WTO Code of Good Practice. In accepting the TBT Agreement, WTO Members agree to ensure that their central government standardizing bodies accept and comply with this Code of Good Practice and agree also to take reasonable measures to ensure that local government, non-governmental and regional standardizing bodies do the same (for the definition of "standardizing bodies" see ISO/IEC Guide 2). The Code is therefore open to acceptance by all such bodies.

THE WTO AGREEMENT ON THE APPLICATION OF SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS)
The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) sets out the basic rules for food safety and animal and plant health standards. It allows countries to set their own standards. But it also says regulations must be based on science. They should be applied only to the extent necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health. And they should not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate between countries where identical or similar conditions prevail. The WTO Member countries are encouraged to use international standards, guidelines and recommendations where they exist. However, members may use measures which result in higher standards if there is scientific justification. They can also set higher standards based on appropriate assessment of risks so long as the approach is consistent, not arbitrary. For further details, please see the detailed sections of the WTO web site concerning SPS.

Posted by xstatic99645 at 10:01 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
Unwanted Horse Coalition Folded into AHC
Topic: Equine Working Group

 

              

 

 

Unwanted Horse Coalition Folded into AHC

 

June 27, 2006, Washington, D.C. – The Unwanted Horse Coalition, which started as the Unwanted Horse Summit during the American Horse Council’s annual convention in April, 2005, is being folded into the American Horse Council, it was announced today by Nick Nicholson, the Chairman of the American Horse Council.

 “The issue of ‘unwanted horses’ has faced this industry for some time,” said Nicholson, President of Keeneland Association.  “It is an important and challenging national issue that faces all breeds and all activities in the horse world.  Putting this initiative under the umbrella of the AHC, which represents all segments of the horse industry, is a natural fit.”

 The Unwanted Horse Coalition grew out of a workshop that the American Association of Equine Practitioners organized as part of the 2005 AHC National Issues Forum in Washington, D.C.

 That meeting, and a subsequent summit in Chicago five months later, drew equine and welfare organizations together to begin discussions about the tens of thousands of horses that are unwanted each year and sent to slaughter facilities. 

 Over the last 18 months, the group developed a mission statement, began identifying long-term solutions for improving the quality of life for unwanted horses, and considered an operating plan that ultimately led to the suggestion that the AHC provide a permanent administrative home for the group’s work.

 “The need for a more formal structure, funding and staff to accomplish the Coalition’s mission prompted many of the members of the Coalition to suggest that it be affiliated with the AHC,” explained Dr. Tom Lenz, who is a past President of the AAEP and served as chairman of the group. “Many of these associations already have a relationship with the Horse Council and feel comfortable in getting the Council more involved.”

 The mission of the Coalition is to explore ways to reduce the number of horses that are unwanted each year and to improve their welfare through education and the efforts of organizations committed to the health, safety and responsible care of the horse.  Owner education will be a focal point.

 Advocacy in the legislative arena is not part of the mission.  In fact, the Coalition will not involve itself in any federal or state legislation dealing with slaughter or the processing of horses for human consumption. 

 “The horse industry has a responsibility to its horses,” said Jay Hickey, President of the AHC.  “All organizations and individuals, whether they use their horses for breeding, sport, show, work, recreation or pleasure, have a responsibility to ensure that everything is being done to minimize the number of horses that might fall into this unwanted group.” 

Several members of the Coalition have already indicated they will continue to be involved with the effort through the AHC and provide funding.  The list includes the American Association of Equine Practitioners, American Quarter Horse Association, National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, National Thoroughbred Racing Association, Professional Rodeo Stock Contractors, The Jockey Club, and the U.S. Trotting Association.

 “We expect other organizations to be added to these groups,” said Hickey.  “Several have already indicated their interest in staying involved in this effort.”

 The Coalition will be hiring a staff person to run the day-to-day activities of the Coalition and a web site will be launched in the near future to provide horse owners with resources about caring for horses and finding new homes for them.

 As the national trade association representing the horse industry in Washington, D.C., the American Horse Council works daily to represent equine interests and investments. Organized in 1969, the AHC promotes and protects the industry by communicating with Congress, federal agencies, the media and the industry on behalf of all horse related interests each and every day.             
<!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->
The AHC is member supported by individuals and organizations representing virtually every facet of the horse world from owners, breeders, veterinarians, farriers, breed registries and horsemen's associations to horse shows, race tracks, rodeos, commercial suppliers and state horse councils.

Anything marked in read in the above article are all Pro NAIS

 

http://www.unwantedhorsecoalition.org/?id=4&s=3


Current Unwanted Horse Coalition Member Organizations  Dr. Tom Lenz, UHC Chairman. Past President of the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP)

 

More and more horse organization are joining the UHC, What better way to get more people in NAIS then by the use of the unwanted horse coalition. The listed groups and people above are also the same that sat on the Equine Species Working Group for the National Animal Identification System.
 


Posted by xstatic99645 at 9:52 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
The Jockey Club Know your enemy
In order to purchase one of these COMPLIANT RFID 11784/11785 chips you must have a premises id....The Jockey club is now a reseller of these chips. No premises id No chip......
 
 
https://www.registry.jockeyclub.com/registry.cfm?page=dotRegistryHelpDeskMicrochips&CFID=8301802&CFTOKEN=46762169
Microchips provided by The Jockey Club are USDA National Animal Identification System compliant and are in conformity with recommendations made by the International Stud Book Committee. The Jockey Club recommends shipping microchips to the address where the horse is located and will only ship to an address associated with a premises identification number (PIN) issued by the appropriate state or tribal animal health authority. To obtain a PIN, please register your premises with the state or tribal animal health authority in the state where your premises is located. For more information on premises registration or to register your premises, visit http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/premises_id/index.shtml. Please note, the address where the microchip will be mailed and the address registered with the premises must match. 
 
The Jockey Club has been and is involved with the Equine Species Working Group right from the start of NAIS. .
 
You can read more here... http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/44033.htm
 
Many of you adopt TB's thru Canter etc. If these horses are chipped with NAIS compliant RFID chips, then in order to purchase or rescue a TB you will be required to have a premises id... But of course its all VOLUNTARY until you want to purchase a horse with a NAIS complaint chip!
 
http://www.thehorse.com/viewarticle.aspx?id=11472
 
The Jockey Club will ship microchips only to addresses associated with a premises identification number issued by the appropriate state or tribal animal health authority. To receive a PIN, Thoroughbred farm owners/operators may visit AnimalID.APHIS.USDA.dov/NAIS/premises_id/index.shtml.
 
 
The Jockey Club also  participated in the Equine Working Group for the National Animal Identification System
 
 
www.naisinfocentral.net
 

Posted by xstatic99645 at 9:42 AM YST
Updated: Monday, 12 January 2009 9:45 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
The Jockey Club Know your enemy
Topic: NAIS
In order to purchase one of these COMPLIANT RFID 11784/11785 chips you must have a premises id....The Jockey club is now a reseller of these chips. No premises id No chip......
 
 
https://www.registry.jockeyclub.com/registry.cfm?page=dotRegistryHelpDeskMicrochips&CFID=8301802&CFTOKEN=46762169
Microchips provided by The Jockey Club are USDA National Animal Identification System compliant and are in conformity with recommendations made by the International Stud Book Committee. The Jockey Club recommends shipping microchips to the address where the horse is located and will only ship to an address associated with a premises identification number (PIN) issued by the appropriate state or tribal animal health authority. To obtain a PIN, please register your premises with the state or tribal animal health authority in the state where your premises is located. For more information on premises registration or to register your premises, visit http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/premises_id/index.shtml. Please note, the address where the microchip will be mailed and the address registered with the premises must match. 
 
The Jockey Club has been and is involved with the Equine Species Working Group right from the start of NAIS. .
 
You can read more here... http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/44033.htm
 
Many of you adopt TB's thru Canter etc. If these horses are chipped with NAIS compliant RFID chips, then in order to purchase or rescue a TB you will be required to have a premises id... But of course its all VOLUNTARY until you want to purchase a horse with a NAIS complaint chip!
 
http://www.thehorse.com/viewarticle.aspx?id=11472
 
The Jockey Club will ship microchips only to addresses associated with a premises identification number issued by the appropriate state or tribal animal health authority. To receive a PIN, Thoroughbred farm owners/operators may visit AnimalID.APHIS.USDA.dov/NAIS/premises_id/index.shtml.

Posted by xstatic99645 at 9:35 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink

Topic: World Trade Agreements
This is what Traceability is all about to facilitate TRADE and that includes
 the NAIS, The animal id program in  Canada, in the EU, in  Japan, ETC.
Page 11 of the GAO report.
 
With regard to equivalent food safety standards between countries, the
Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures—
Entered into force with the establishment of the World Trade Organization
(WTO) on January 1, 1995—affirms that member countries are allowed to
Adopt and enforce measures necessary to protect human, animal, or plant
Life or health, provided, among other things, the measures are based and
Maintained on scientific principles and evidence, do not arbitrarily or
Unjustifiably discriminate among WTO members, and are not applied in a
Manner that would constitute a disguised restriction on international
Trade. In turn, member countries are expected to accept the sanitary or
Phytosanitary measures of other member countries as equivalent if the
Exporting member objectively demonstrates that its measures achieve the
Importing member's appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary
Protection. Members are encouraged to use relevant international
Standards and work toward harmonization—that is, the adoption of
 

Common sanitary or phytosanitary measures—to facilitate trade.
Consistent with the principles of the sanitary and phytosanitary
Agreement, many countries use equivalency agreements to certify that
Their food safety systems are equivalent to those of the country importing
Products. All countries in our review are parties to the WTO and to the
Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures.
 

__,_._,___
 

Posted by xstatic99645 at 9:03 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older