« May 2013 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics
2nd amendment rights
4-H and Agenda 21
Agenda 21
Alaska Represenatives
Animal Disease Testing
COOL
Dog Laws
Equine Working Group
FDA
Food
GIS
Govenor Palin
HSUS & PETA
I'm Tired
ICAR
NAIS  «
Real ID
Trade
UNESCO
USDA
World Trade Agreements
Rants on This and That
Monday, 12 January 2009
The Jockey Club Know your enemy
Topic: NAIS
In order to purchase one of these COMPLIANT RFID 11784/11785 chips you must have a premises id....The Jockey club is now a reseller of these chips. No premises id No chip......
 
 
https://www.registry.jockeyclub.com/registry.cfm?page=dotRegistryHelpDeskMicrochips&CFID=8301802&CFTOKEN=46762169
Microchips provided by The Jockey Club are USDA National Animal Identification System compliant and are in conformity with recommendations made by the International Stud Book Committee. The Jockey Club recommends shipping microchips to the address where the horse is located and will only ship to an address associated with a premises identification number (PIN) issued by the appropriate state or tribal animal health authority. To obtain a PIN, please register your premises with the state or tribal animal health authority in the state where your premises is located. For more information on premises registration or to register your premises, visit http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/premises_id/index.shtml. Please note, the address where the microchip will be mailed and the address registered with the premises must match. 
 
The Jockey Club has been and is involved with the Equine Species Working Group right from the start of NAIS. .
 
You can read more here... http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/44033.htm
 
Many of you adopt TB's thru Canter etc. If these horses are chipped with NAIS compliant RFID chips, then in order to purchase or rescue a TB you will be required to have a premises id... But of course its all VOLUNTARY until you want to purchase a horse with a NAIS complaint chip!
 
http://www.thehorse.com/viewarticle.aspx?id=11472
 
The Jockey Club will ship microchips only to addresses associated with a premises identification number issued by the appropriate state or tribal animal health authority. To receive a PIN, Thoroughbred farm owners/operators may visit AnimalID.APHIS.USDA.dov/NAIS/premises_id/index.shtml.

Posted by xstatic99645 at 9:35 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 10 January 2009
NAIS and Food Safety
Topic: NAIS
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-animal-identification-feb19,1,6330935,full.story

Quote from above article "Food safety experts argue that the NAIS system is
vital to protect consumers from the unintentional spread of mad cow and
other food-borne diseases."

How will NAIS help in this issue when the USDA firmly states that testing of
ALL cattle is not necessary? And why did Creekstone have to sue to test for
BSE? http://www.creekstonefarms.com/index.html And why does the USDA hold
this patent on this test and ONLY they can test for BSE?  You want to hear
the what the USDA's has to say on this?
http://www.bioethics.iastate.edu/Bioethics_in_Brief/sep07.html

1: The USDA argued that random testing is entirely adequate to insure the
safety of U.S. beef.  Further, the USDA asserted, the tests are neither
necessary nor effective to guarantee food safety.
2: According to the USDA, allowing Creekstone to test its cattle might
undermine consumer confidence in the U.S. meat supply, since a false
positive-that is, a test result that wrongly showed that an animal had
BSE-might raise inappropriate consumer fears.
Now in this article THE USDA had an INCLUSIVE TEST:
http://www.hpj.com/archives/2004/jul04/jul12/IsUSDAcontrollingBSEinfo.CFM
About 7 p.m., June 25, USDA announced that a rapid test on a cow in its
newly broadened BSE surveilliance program gave an inconclusive result. USDA
refused to release information on the age or location of the cow, but said
tissue samples had been sent to the federal laboratory in Ames, Iowa, for a
confirmatory test.. Would this  also  raise inappropriate consumer fears?

So there you have it flip flop goes the weasel......


NAIS stops at the doorway of the Slaughter house...

Quote from Article "The USDA's Knight admits that the animal identification
program's success depends on convincing often-cantankerous cattle producers
that his agency has no ill intent.

Nope not cantankerous Mr. Knight, the premises ID is about property rights
and all the rules and regulations that all livestock owners will have to
follow when states statues have done there job very well in preventing
disease. The only disease is your one mad cow you keep bringing up. Japan
and consumer have told you to test. We have told you to test.  Until
livestock owners open there eyes and see where this program is really
headed, you will all be out of business. The NAIS is an open door policy to
implement much more restrictive programs such as EPA standards, clean air,
clean water and all the other programs that are tied in with the USDA.

Another quote from article "The system is trustworthy, it's honorable and
it's reliable," Peirce said. "We're simply trying to meet consumer desires.
We're in a one-world marketplace, and if they're willing to pay, we want to
give it to them."  But is it all that Peirce cites?
Here another person is justifying the NAIS via there product under the
pretense of "Consumer desires", a one world market place. You see NAIS has
nothing to do with the health of animals or trace back its about PROFITS
and market access at the farmers expense..



The USDA system once upon a time was considered trustworthy, honorable and
reliable but due to people not doing their job or favoring big ag and
skipping certain procedures alone the way for profit has made the USDA a
laughing stock.They are to blame, the slaughter plants should be ashamed
that they not only send out meat that is tainted but they also use abusive
methods to insure profits.


This group of flip flopping weasels cant even sell there own program,let
alone admit that there programs are broken, so instead of fixing what is
broke, they came along and designed another system that is so full of
loopholes even the weasels can crawl through..

Posted by xstatic99645 at 2:51 PM YST
Updated: Saturday, 10 January 2009 2:53 PM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 24 November 2008
The true meaning of NAIS
Topic: NAIS
What is the true meaning of the The National Animal Identification System  in the United States.
 
Three words appear under the title of the USDA's Traceability plan: Harmonization, Convergence, and National.
 
 
Harmonization in international law means  the process by which different states adopt the same laws.
 
Convergence is  the merging of distinct technologies, industries, or devices into a unified whole.
 
National is the belonging to or maintained by the federal goverment.

 Convergence -Other statements in the documents make reference to ISO  International Standards Organization  which has/is establishing standards of global uniformity, consistent with the needs of global government and global systems.


Posted by xstatic99645 at 11:57 AM YST
Updated: Monday, 24 November 2008 12:05 PM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink
APATHY everywhere
Topic: NAIS

I am going to start my first rant concerning Apathy on the National Animal Identification System. I just received this email (below) from the Sporting Dog Alliance Group. Mr. Yates has brought up some very good points again. Not only has he seen the Apathy in the dog world I see this in the very community I live in when it comes to the NAIS. Pure silence!

The very people who say they love their animals will find out that owning these animals  will truly become the biggest burdens of beast due to federal rules and regulations. None of these people understand the true meaning  of NAIS. More impressing matters are there concerns such as meddling in everyone's business  on what consistutes responsiblity. Never will they agree on who is right, like is a stock tank full or half full.  None of them will get there heads out of the clouds long enough to understand that there days in livestock owner ship is numbered. 

 

 

Apathy, inaction may doom dog ownership in America

Posted on November 24, 2008, 8:19am by Guymon Community Representative, Debbie Browning

By JOHN YATES / American Sporting Dog Alliance

http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org

asda@csonline.net

 

WASHINGTON – Barack Obama will be the 44th president of the United States following a landslide victory based on strong support from an overwhelming percentage of the electorate. He also carried the Democratic Party to virtually unassailable power in both the House and Senate.

 

Obama sought after and received the strong endorsement of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), and this animal rights organization most certainly will try to cash in its political chips in ways that are likely to threaten dog owners, owners of other kinds of animals, hunters, gun owners and farmers.

 

That is not mere speculation. It is the way American politics works. To the victor go the spoils.

 

For dog owners, the next four years likely will decide our future. If we fail to act cohesively and effectively, our ownership of the dogs we love is doomed.

 

We will not be polite and we will not sugarcoat reality.

 

This is the political reality we must face in order to preserve dog ownership rights:

 

  • Dog owners who support Obama must play a major role. You are the only group of dog owners who can get through to The President-elect and his allies in Congress at this crucial point in time. You are the only dog owners who can convince President-elect Obama that HSUS and other animal rights groups are distorting the truth to accomplish a larger hidden agenda. You are the only people who can make our voices heard as the President sets his legislative agenda and makes key appointments. It is imperative for dog owners to have a strong and clear voice on the Obama Transition Team.

 

  • Dog owners who oppose Obama need to stuff it. President-elect Obama simply won’t listen if you whine, moan, complain, or huff and puff venom. This will cause your voices to be ignored. If you want to do something to save dog ownership, you must set aside your political differences with The President-elect and attempt to communicate with him, and also with members of Congress. Venom will accomplish only one thing: It will assure that HSUS is the only voice heard by President-elect Obama. You lost the election. It was a slaughter. Deal with it. Obama has promised to reach out to his political opponents. It’s time for you to reach out to him.

 

  • The majority of dog owners have buried their heads in the sand. They have done nothing. They are fiddling while Rome is burning. They are the real enemy of dog ownership because they are the huge majority of the American electorate and their silence has served the interests of the tiny minority of animal rights fanatics. In every poll on dog ownership issues, they outnumber animal rights advocates five to one, but their voices are not being heard by the politicians. If you don’t stand up and fight back now, all will be lost. You will have only yourselves to blame. You no longer can depend on having other people fight your battles. If you don’t begin to fight back against the animal rights groups, your rights will be ripped away from you. No one can protect you any longer. You must protect yourselves.

 

  • Some dog owners spend more time and effort trying to destroy unity than they do fighting against the animal rights groups. Several dog owners’ organizations preach only to the choir and battle each other for “turf” and the myth of “leadership.” Petty rivalries will destroy us. Some dog owners point fingers at other dog owners and label them as “good” or “bad.” This is a thinly disguised attempt to deal away the rights of some dog owners in order to save their own privileges with Caesar. They are the modern equivalent of Benedict Arnold. They will sell their soul and beg for a bowl of porridge. Our advice to these organizations and people is simple: We either hang together or we hang separately. Get it?

 

The 2008 election was one of the most divisive and emotional in modern history. Many supporters and opponents of both candidates passionately expressed anger, outrage, distrust and bitterness toward their opponents.

 

At best, healing will be difficult to achieve. At worst, political antagonisms will boil over and the new power structure will attempt to destroy and bury the old. In today’s political reality, many elected officials see dog owners as vestiges of the past.

 

While both sides have spoken of unity and reconciliation in the days following the election, the truth is that this has happened only rarely in American politics. When one political viewpoint has gained supremacy, its adherents tend to exploit their power to the greatest possible extent and bury the opposition.

 

Like it or not, the magnitude of Obama’s victory has placed dog owners, hunters, gun owners and farmers in the crosshairs. After decades of seeing ourselves as the mainstream, we have found ourselves in the uncomfortable and dangerous position of being seen by government as irrelevant outsiders who are merely reactionary and outdated: Modern rednecks, if you will. That is the message HSUS will be imparting to President-elect Obama.

 

Like it or not, dog owners, hunters and farmers have the present status of “non-persons” in the Obama Administration. That is because all of the organizations that represent us actively or implicitly opposed Obama’s candidacy (because of the HSUS endorsement), while HSUS enthusiastically supported Obama. It is human nature for Obama to listen more empathetically to supporters than to opponents.

 

We cannot ignore this reality.

 

Our only hope is to convince President-elect Obama that the vast majority of Americans want to preserve the right of animal ownership without interference from government.

 

Furthermore, we have to convince him of what we all know to be absolutely true: That this is the best thing for animals. Never in human history have dogs had better lives than they do in modern America, and that this is because their owners love them and care deeply about their welfare.

 

The American Sporting Dog Alliance firmly believes that animal owners, hunters, gun owners and farmers are still the mainstream of America. However, it also is indisputably true that many of us did not make these issues a high priority in deciding how we voted this year.

 

We can be certain that HSUS and other groups that oppose us will loudly proclaim that the 2008 election has proven that we are an insignificant political and social force in modern America. They will claim that our voices and our rights don’t count anymore.

 

We must prove otherwise to President-elect Obama.

 

The way to start is to contact Obama’s Transition Team and express your concerns about the hidden HSUS agenda for the future of animal ownership. President-elect Obama must learn the truth about HSUS and the animal rights movements, and it is up to us to inform him.

 

The truth about HSUS is that it is an animal rights group based on the belief that the private ownership of animals is exploitation, including for companion animals, and its agenda is to reduce animal ownership in America as rapidly as is politically feasible. HSUS’ long-range goal is the complete elimination of domestic animals.

 

HSUS, which is very well organized and opulently funded, is a master of public relations that has learned all of the tricks to bombard the American public with distorted horror stories about animal owners, thus manufacturing political pressure for restrictive laws. HSUS constantly pounds the media with stories about puppy mills, backyard breeders, dog fighters and animal hoarders, with the goal of painting all dog owners with a tar-covered brush.

 

Don’t kid yourself. They are talking about you.

 

HSUS deliberately ignores the truth, that the vast majority of people who own and raise dogs care very deeply about them and give them the best possible care. The HSUS agenda is to severely regulate all animal ownership, to take away our rights to raise animals and make the basic decisions about their lives, to subject all of us to constant oversight by government, and to create frightening liabilities.

 

Please also urge The President-elect to limit the advisory role of HSUS, because the organization is a special interest group that does not represent the views of the vast majority of Americans. A huge majority of us want to own dogs, cats, horses and other animals. About half of us want to hunt and the future of American wildlife depends on hunters, who are the only group to match their mouths with their money. More than 90-percent of us want to eat meat, and do not want to become vegan vegetarians.

 

Strongly but supportively urge The President-elect to listen to our voices when he makes appointments, develops a legislative agenda, and reviews administrative policies.

 

Here is a link to a form to send your comments to the Obama Transition Team: http://www.change.gov/page/s/contact. Please do not delay sending your letter to the Obama team, as many important things are happening behind the scenes right now.

 

We urge dog owners to take a supportive approach and to refrain from saying anything that could be viewed as antagonism toward the new President-elect. Remember that the purpose of writing is not to score political points, but instead to let Obama’s team know the sentiments of the American public about animal issues. Our goal is to counteract HSUS propaganda with the truth and to let the incoming president know what the people do and don’t want.

 

The American Sporting Dog Alliance has contacted the Obama Transition Team and offered our services to the incoming Administration. We have specifically requested to participate in the selection process for key officials in the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and the Interior, and also to serve on a proposed animal issues advisory board. We do not know if our request will be accepted or rejected, but we strongly believe that the President-elect needs to hear the concerns of dog ownership advocates.

 

When contacting the Obama Transition Team, please keep the following issues in mind:

 

  • It is vital that the new Secretary of Agriculture supports the concept of animal ownership, as dog and kennel regulation and enforcement on the federal level ultimately stem from this appointment. Any new federal laws about animals, including dogs, will be handled by this agency. The Department of Agriculture administers and enforces the Pet Animal Welfare Act and the National Forest system. Another USDA program regulates the interstate shipment and farming of game birds. Obama will appoint the new USDA secretary.

 

  • Obama also will appoint the heads of USDA’s Pet Animal Welfare Act program, the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) program and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), which administers National Forest lands and sets management policies. Land and wildlife management decisions stem from this appointment, including the continued use of hunting as a management tool, habitat management practices to benefit wildlife, and conducting field trials on public lands. There will be much pressure from HSUS to limit hunting and allow only natural forces (such as storms and fires) to determine habitat. NAIS tracks the movement and location of all farm animals, including horses, and soon will require continual monitoring of the location of all horses used for dog training and field trials. Some sources say that dogs may be included in NAIS at some point.

 

  • Another key Obama appointment will be the new Secretary of the Interior. This person will administer public lands for the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Reclamation Services and the National Wildlife Refuge system, and also effectively controls all state-owned public lands used for hunting and field trials that receive funding from the Pittman-Robertson Act. The new Secretary of the Interior and other Obama appointees will manage the bureaus of this agency that will play key roles in the future of field trials, hunting with dogs and habitat management.

 

  • It is very likely that an amendment to the Pet Animal Welfare Act will be introduced in Congress early in 2009. At present, this Act governs only kennels that sell dogs on the wholesale level. However, several recent HSUS-backed attempts to amend this law would have greatly expanded the number of kennels that are federally regulated, and would have affected almost everyone who raises puppies or keeps a moderately sized kennel for any purpose. Sen. Dick Durbin, who was Obama’s key mentor in the U.S. Senate, sponsored two HSUS-sanctioned amendments in 2008, including the currently pending “PUPS” bill (the “Puppy Uniform Protection Statute”). This legislation also may come as an amendment to the 2009 Farm Bill, which was a Durbin tactics earlier in 2008.

 

  • The Transition Team includes Bart Chilton, who was chief of staff and political liaison for the National Farmers Union, and also worked for USDA. His NFU affiliation may mean that he is inclined to support private ownership of farm animals. Another member is Carole Jett, who retired this year from the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, which works with federally owned National Forest land that is used for hunting and cover dog field trials.

 

  • And Vice President-elect Joe Biden has received 100-percent positive ratings from HSUS for many years, and may play a key role in the Obama Administration on animal issues.

 

It is no exaggeration to say that dog owners will face unprecedented challenges over the next four or more years, and that HSUS and other animal rights groups will enjoy unprecedented influence in the White House and Congress. An HSUS blog says that House and Senate candidates endorsed by the animal rights group prevailed in the recent election by a 290-to-17 margin. That is sobering news for dog owners.

 

In the strongest possible terms, we urge every dog owner in America to join and actively support at least one organization that is fighting to preserve your rights. Participation is imperative. Without your participation and support, dog ownership in America will be doomed. Sitting on the sidelines is not an option.

 

The American Sporting Dog Alliance would be honored by your support of our efforts on your behalf.

 

Supporting statewide organizations also is vital. Most states have active Federations of Dog Clubs, hunting dog federations and other local or regional groups. They also need your help so that they can help you.

 

No organization can perform miracles, and none is stronger than the support they receive from their members. The essential roles of organizations are to develop working relationships with elected officials, to bring dog owners together for coordinated action, to keep dog owners informed about the issues, and to provide them with a way to take effective action as citizens.

 

The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We welcome people who work with other breeds, too, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.

 

Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. Our email is ASDA@csonline.net. Complete directions to join by mail or online are found at the bottom left of each page.


Posted by xstatic99645 at 8:58 AM YST
Updated: Monday, 24 November 2008 11:56 AM YST
Share This Post Share This Post
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older